Pour kettle and let steep the gods of tea. I built NewsBlur and Turn Touch.
1333 stories
·
870 followers

Apple Podcasts Is Adding AI-Generated Chapters for Podcasts Without Chapters

1 Comment

News from Apple’s Podcasts for Creators site, regarding new features in the iOS 26.2 beta releases:

When you supply chapters in your episode description or in your RSS feed, they display in Apple Podcasts. If you submit chapters through your hosting provider, you can include images. For shows in English, when chapters aren’t provided, Apple Podcasts generates them for you and an “Automatically created“ label appears in the chapter list. If you prefer not to use automatically created chapters, you can disable this feature in Apple Podcasts Connect. Learn more about chapters.

It’s unclear to me whether this feature is actually exclusive to iOS/iPhone, or will be available across Apple’s 26.2 OS releases. This strikes me as a great use of AI, but I also think most multi-topic podcasts should include human-created chapters.

Read the whole story
samuel
11 hours ago
reply
I was doing this on email newsletters on Sol Reader, since we have a ToC there. But NewsBlur isn't for long-form reading, so why bother here? You're never reading a single story for > 30 minutes, but I can see the appeal for long stories.

I'm building an "Ask a Story a Question" feature and a ToC might be nice. I'll see if I can add it without too much work, since it'll have to use a function to get reliable structured data.
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Share this story
Delete

Quoting @belligerentbarbies

1 Comment and 4 Shares

I'm worried that they put co-pilot in Excel because Excel is the beast that drives our entire economy and do you know who has tamed that beast?

Brenda.

Who is Brenda?

She is a mid-level employee in every finance department, in every business across this stupid nation and the Excel goddess herself descended from the heavens, kissed Brenda on her forehead and the sweat from Brenda's brow is what allows us to do capitalism. [...]

She's gonna birth that formula for a financial report and then she's gonna send that financial report to a higher up and he's gonna need to make a change to the report and normally he would have sent it back to Brenda but he's like oh I have AI and AI is probably like smarter than Brenda and then the AI is gonna fuck it up real bad and he won't be able to recognize it because he doesn't understand Excel because AI hallucinates.

You know who's not hallucinating?

Brenda.

@belligerentbarbies, on TikTok

Tags: generative-ai, ai, excel, hallucinations, llms, tiktok, ai-ethics

Read the whole story
samuel
11 hours ago
reply
Cambridge, Massachusetts
denubis
1 day ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
philipstorry
4 hours ago
reply
Worse, Brenda understands the business in ways that the executive and the AI cannot - because she sees the whole, as she's in a support role.
The executive might be asking the wrong question, and the AI will congratulate them on what an excellent question it is, then give an answer which is technically correct but actually wrong. Or worse, illegal.
Oh crap, we're headed towards multiple accounting scandals because of this, aren't we?
London, United Kingdom

Full-text filtering lets you train on any phrase

1 Comment and 4 Shares

Today we’re launching text-based intelligence classifiers, a powerful new way to train NewsBlur to show you exactly what you want to read. You’ve always been able to train NewsBlur’s intelligence using story titles, authors, tags, and publishers. Now you can train on any phrase that appears in the full text of a story. This feature is available exclusively to NewsBlur Premium Archive subscribers.

Text-based classifiers work just like the intelligence training you’re already familiar with. Find a phrase you care about, mark it as something you like or dislike, and NewsBlur will automatically highlight or hide future stories containing that phrase. Stories with phrases you like are marked with a green focus indicator, while stories with phrases you dislike are hidden unless you choose to view them.

How to use text-based classifiers

Reading a story and spot a phrase you want to see more of? Simply select the text with your mouse or trackpad, then click the “Train” button that appears.

This opens the intelligence trainer where you can mark the selected text as something you like (thumbs up) or dislike (thumbs down). The text classifier appears at the top of the trainer dialog, ready for you to train.

Once you’ve trained a text phrase, NewsBlur will automatically scan the full text of every story from that feed. Stories containing your phrase will be highlighted with a green focus indicator in your story list, making them easy to spot. You can also see the phrase highlighted throughout the story content itself.

Real-world examples

Text-based classifiers shine when you subscribe to broad-interest feeds but only care about specific topics. Here are some examples:

  • Subscribe to a food blog that covers everything, but only want to read about vegan recipes? Train on “vegan” and similar terms.
  • Reading a tech blog that writes about many frameworks, but you only want stories about your favorite language? Train on that language name.
  • Following a news site with mixed content, but only interested in stories about a specific region or topic? Train on location names or topic keywords.

Since text classifiers work on the full article text and not just titles, they catch stories that might not mention your interest in the headline but discuss it in depth within the article.

Green always wins

Just like with other intelligence classifiers, green (focus) always wins. If a story matches both a phrase you like and a phrase you dislike, NewsBlur will mark it as focus and show it in your unread count. This ensures you never miss a story about something you care about, even if it also contains topics you’re less interested in.

You can view your focus stories by choosing between Unread and Focus at the bottom of the feed list. Set it to Focus to show only green stories and see everything NewsBlur knows you want to read.

Why Premium Archive only?

Text-based classifiers require scanning the full article content of every story, not just the RSS feed excerpt. The Premium Archive subscription ensures every story is fetched, archived, and available for full-text search and classification. This means your text classifiers work on every story from every feed you subscribe to, with no gaps in coverage.

The Premium Archive subscription also includes unlimited story archiving, the ability to mark any story as unread forever, full-text search across your entire archive, and the discover stories feature for finding related content across all your feeds.

Available now on the web

Text-based classifiers are available now to all Premium Archive subscribers on the web. Simply highlight any phrase in a story, click the “Train” button, and start training. iOS and Android support is coming soon.

If you’re not yet a Premium Archive subscriber and want to unlock text-based intelligence training along with unlimited archiving and advanced search, you can upgrade directly on the web.

As always, we’d love to hear your feedback on the NewsBlur forum. For every person who shares their thoughts, there are a dozen others thinking the same thing, so your input helps shape where NewsBlur goes next.

Read the whole story
samuel
2 days ago
reply
Coming soon to iOS and Android!
Cambridge, Massachusetts
denubis
2 days ago
reply
acdha
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Life Is More Than an Engineering Problem, an interview with Ted Chiang...

1 Comment and 4 Shares
Life Is More Than an Engineering Problem, an interview with Ted Chiang from earlier this year. “I don’t believe it’s meaningful to say that something is better art absent any context of how it was created. Art is all about context.”

💬 Join the discussion on kottke.org

Read the whole story
samuel
33 days ago
reply
Fantastic interview. So many good metaphors and stories from Ted Chiang, one of my favorite writers.
Cambridge, Massachusetts
ChrisDL
29 days ago
reply
New York
betajames
32 days ago
reply
Michigan
Share this story
Delete

You’re Running on Autopilot Way More Often Than You Think

1 Comment

Think about what you did this morning. You woke up, brushed your teeth, made coffee, maybe scrolled your phone, maybe drove the same route to work that you do every day. How many of those things did you actually think about? According to new research, probably none. Scientists say nearly nine out of every ten daily actions happen on autopilot, with our brains running the show long before conscious thought gets involved.

The study, published in Psychology & Health, tracked 105 people for a week. Participants were pinged six times a day and had to report what they were doing, along with how deliberate or automatic it felt.

Across more than 3,700 reports, researchers found that 88 percent of behaviors were carried out automatically, while about two-thirds were triggered by habit rather than decision-making.

Lead researcher Amanda Rebar, an associate professor at the University of South Carolina, explained that this automation shows up in two ways.

“Habitual instigation occurs when environmental cues automatically trigger the decision to do something, like reaching for your phone when you hear a notification. Habitual execution happens when you perform an action smoothly without thinking about the mechanics, such as brushing your teeth or driving a familiar route,” she said in a statement.

Most people like to imagine themselves as rational actors, carefully weighing each choice they make. In practice, the study shows, life is closer to a string of well-worn loops. And those loops don’t vary much. Age, gender, and relationship status had no real effect on how habitual someone’s behavior looked.

One exception was exercise. People were more likely to start workouts based on cues, which could mean a reminder on their phone or a regular time of day, but still had to engage consciously once they got moving. Running, lifting, or cycling doesn’t complete itself, even if the decision to start feels automatic.

Habits, it turns out, often line up with what people want. Almost half of all reported behaviors were both intentional and automatic, while only a small fraction clashed with someone’s goals. That makes habits a surprisingly strong ally for anyone hoping to change.

Benjamin Gardner, a psychology professor at the University of Surrey and co-author of the study, said strategies for habit formation are more effective than willpower alone.

“For people who want to break their bad habits, simply telling them to ‘try harder’ isn’t enough,” he said. Building cues for healthier choices—or dismantling the ones tied to unhelpful patterns—might be the clearest path to change.

Most of what you do today will unfold without much thought. The trick, researchers suggest, is shaping those automatic moments to get you one step closer in the direction you actually want to go.

The post You’re Running on Autopilot Way More Often Than You Think appeared first on VICE.

Read the whole story
samuel
43 days ago
reply
I believe this applies to speech as well
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Share this story
Delete

ChatGPT Is Blowing Up Marriages as Spouses Use AI to Attack Their Partners

2 Comments

ChatGPT Is Blowing Up Marriages as Spouses Use AI to Attack Their Partners

Maggie Harrison Dupré for Futurism. It turns out having an always-available "marriage therapist" with a sycophantic instinct to always take your side is catastrophic for relationships.

The tension in the vehicle is palpable. The marriage has been on the rocks for months, and the wife in the passenger seat, who recently requested an official separation, has been asking her spouse not to fight with her in front of their kids. But as the family speeds down the roadway, the spouse in the driver’s seat pulls out a smartphone and starts quizzing ChatGPT’s Voice Mode about their relationship problems, feeding the chatbot leading prompts that result in the AI browbeating her wife in front of their preschool-aged children.

Tags: ai, generative-ai, chatgpt, llms, ai-ethics, ai-personality

Read the whole story
samuel
44 days ago
reply
I’ll quote the passage that I think this entire article boils down to, which is the final section:

The couple whose marriage had fallen apart after a previous reconciliation — the one in which the wife used ChatGPT to text their 10-year-old son about divorce — eventually agreed that splitting up was the right choice. As they prepared to file their case, things felt civil, the husband said.

Until one day, that is, when his wife broke a joint agreement to avoid large purchases before their case was filed. Feeling frustrated and betrayed, he pulled out his phone and started messaging with something he knew would respond: ChatGPT.

“I was just in rage,” said the husband. “And I kept engaging with ChatGPT that evening, and it kept telling me that this is a legal problem, and that she crossed a major line, and here’s how to bring it up with my lawyer, and here’s what the lawyer should file.”

The man described his vexation building as he continued to talk to the bot. ChatGPT, fed only his side of the story, characterized his wife’s behavior as manipulative, calculating, and reckless; her actions were deeply serious, it said, and encouraged the husband to take legal action.

The next day, distressed and still simmering with anger, the husband took the situation to his human lawyer. And as it turned out? It wasn’t a big deal at all.

“When I talked to my actual lawyer the next day, my lawyer was like, ‘that’s fine,'” the man recalled. “And at that point I realized — oh my god, I just went down the same spiral.”

“I can see how it happens,” he said. “It happened firsthand to me.”
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
rocketo
44 days ago
reply
really fucking sad
seattle, wa
Next Page of Stories